Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-23 18:09:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E2602AE1D0E722288F72403330F8C9B296DEAE1D70D6DCC16D33A9BA793C8009
Participant Details

Original Note:

Community Note niet nodig. Hoewel hypocriet gezien de context van wachtgeld en Richard de Mos, gaat het hier om een mening en niet om een inhoudelijke discussie(punt).

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1694360313271873574
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E2602AE1D0E722288F72403330F8C9B296DEAE1D70D6DCC16D33A9BA793C8009
  • createdAtMillis - 1692814171931
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1694360313271873574E2602AE1D0E722288F72403330F8C9B296DEAE1D70D6DCC16D33A9BA793C8009