Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-23 14:56:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 30B3EF7B865098EB5FE39E2E59C0CBF740C1376D4CD0D9C9D52F1E2900985C3B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Community Note niet nodig. Hoewel hypocriet gezien de context van wachtgeld en Richard de Mos, gaat het hier om een mening en niet om een inhoudelijke discussie(punt).

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1694360313271873574
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 30B3EF7B865098EB5FE39E2E59C0CBF740C1376D4CD0D9C9D52F1E2900985C3B
  • createdAtMillis - 1692802599835
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 169436031327187357430B3EF7B865098EB5FE39E2E59C0CBF740C1376D4CD0D9C9D52F1E2900985C3B