Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-23 16:04:55 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1CC9CF28322D7FC929CF5F706B21568344A5CC734A6BA10BF4FA0637A14EEAE7
Participant Details

Original Note:

Posting a screenshot of an article for the purposes of criticism/ridicule is quintessential fair use. It has been ruled as such by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=16123870533770783973 https://freedom.press/news/fair-use-win-in-screenshot-case-is-a-victory-for-media-reporting/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1694089698661081097
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 1CC9CF28322D7FC929CF5F706B21568344A5CC734A6BA10BF4FA0637A14EEAE7
createdAtMillis - 1692806695329
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 1
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 16940896986610810971CC9CF28322D7FC929CF5F706B21568344A5CC734A6BA10BF4FA0637A14EEAE7