Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-22 22:17:26 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F49F821FE28C76205A484281B208F39E16F0D1FD61B62EBA609892252DF86F54
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is misinformation. The post claims to have performed an analysis that is impossible given available data. https://twitter.com/jsm2334/status/1693723767216701878?t=Q3p0pbUDcQEGaUOP4Or6_A&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1694015934262849994
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F49F821FE28C76205A484281B208F39E16F0D1FD61B62EBA609892252DF86F54
  • createdAtMillis - 1692742646193
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1694015934262849994F49F821FE28C76205A484281B208F39E16F0D1FD61B62EBA609892252DF86F54