Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-22 14:55:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 572407459B025B484BE35D7BC84BBC3477AFE3D3975A6B2B6020D090F2D1B3F5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ce poste n'est pas trompeur. Il ne s'agit que de son avis. L'ajout d'un contexte peut être utile. La pollution radioactive sera bien rejetée dans l'océan, bien que présente en faible quantité.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1693978349767467029
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 572407459B025B484BE35D7BC84BBC3477AFE3D3975A6B2B6020D090F2D1B3F5
  • createdAtMillis - 1692716127830
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1693978349767467029572407459B025B484BE35D7BC84BBC3477AFE3D3975A6B2B6020D090F2D1B3F5