Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-22 11:18:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E1C882862E2D92AE7D75662E29B7455F7EA7ED1E2F8C055E5F90E80A93A62704
Participant Details

Original Note:

This satirical statement is entirely made up. Much of science funding is centralized and has no particular bias. On the other hand there is a huge incentive to scientists to investigate things that go against the grain, it is how scientists become famous.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1693895481309442515
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E1C882862E2D92AE7D75662E29B7455F7EA7ED1E2F8C055E5F90E80A93A62704
  • createdAtMillis - 1692703105243
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1693895481309442515E1C882862E2D92AE7D75662E29B7455F7EA7ED1E2F8C055E5F90E80A93A62704