Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-16 10:12:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 98E3F0BE5F20157FF4C9D8ABCF71546A195105F818E8F02C2249A91975CC1C65
Participant Details

Original Note:

一般的に「安心」は主観的な物で極論すると無根拠です。 https://www.soumu.go.jp/johotsusintokei/whitepaper/column_uchida.html 「安心できない」や「安心ではない」との発言を政治家がする時には、その過去の発言や行動、何をして何をしなかったかを精査する事を推奨します。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1693892721801630068
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 98E3F0BE5F20157FF4C9D8ABCF71546A195105F818E8F02C2249A91975CC1C65
  • createdAtMillis - 1700129549999
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 169389272180163006898E3F0BE5F20157FF4C9D8ABCF71546A195105F818E8F02C2249A91975CC1C65