Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-08-22 22:03:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: CA13806B4DBB8C01F033A0DC988A4450E9C685A8E3C5E924EAF34A9E9C452221
Participant Details
Original Note:
Judge rules no reasonable person would believe Tucker. “Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer arrives with an appropriate amount of skepticism about the statements he makes." https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/greedy-associates/tucker-carlson-successfully-argues-nobody-really-believes-tucker-carlson-is-reporting-facts/ https://www.businessinsider.in/politics/world/news/fox-news-won-a-court-case-by-persuasively-arguing-that-no-reasonable-viewer-takes-tucker-carlson-seriously/articleshow/78308604.cms https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/09/judge-rules-fox-news-tucker-carlson-not-source-of-news-defamation-suit-mcdougal-trump.html
All Note Details