Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-23 18:18:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 39931AC0D56E40D3A086D749D4203204781DD52F3B90718EA6DC7E77476532E9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Judge rules no reasonable person would believe Tucker. “Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer arrives with an appropriate amount of skepticism about the statements he makes." https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/greedy-associates/tucker-carlson-successfully-argues-nobody-really-believes-tucker-carlson-is-reporting-facts/ https://www.businessinsider.in/politics/world/news/fox-news-won-a-court-case-by-persuasively-arguing-that-no-reasonable-viewer-takes-tucker-carlson-seriously/articleshow/78308604.cms https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/09/judge-rules-fox-news-tucker-carlson-not-source-of-news-defamation-suit-mcdougal-trump.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1693876618077311061
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 39931AC0D56E40D3A086D749D4203204781DD52F3B90718EA6DC7E77476532E9
  • createdAtMillis - 1692814683761
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 169387661807731106139931AC0D56E40D3A086D749D4203204781DD52F3B90718EA6DC7E77476532E9