Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-22 13:44:08 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 40244CBF601286C345505B04AD4AD26D75526BC612E293B7402673BC96F31995
Participant Details

Original Note:

Cela a déjà été debunké. C’est tout simplement faux. https://factuel.afp.com/doc.afp.com.33NP64F

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1693863570230931550
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 40244CBF601286C345505B04AD4AD26D75526BC612E293B7402673BC96F31995
  • createdAtMillis - 1692711848030
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 169386357023093155040244CBF601286C345505B04AD4AD26D75526BC612E293B7402673BC96F31995