Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-22 23:26:37 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1F5105C8860DF561F93B53D371986D630D6DC5BA64699DD97129F2E6C589D349
Participant Details

Original Note:

Cela a déjà été debunké. C’est tout simplement faux. https://factuel.afp.com/doc.afp.com.33NP64F

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1693863570230931550
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1F5105C8860DF561F93B53D371986D630D6DC5BA64699DD97129F2E6C589D349
  • createdAtMillis - 1692746797587
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16938635702309315501F5105C8860DF561F93B53D371986D630D6DC5BA64699DD97129F2E6C589D349