Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-22 03:43:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6A3C83DFCBAB3AB99EDD863DDFA4EDF1379BC9FA4BB78BA35D404D38D180992A
Participant Details

Original Note:

投稿主が引用している東京新聞の記事ではALPSの有効性が記載されており「反論」ではなく「肯定」した内容となっています。 記事を読んでいない人に対して、あたかも東京新聞が「反対」や「反論」しているように誤解を与える投稿です。 https://www.tokyo-np.co.jp/article/268592

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1693827510495330774
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6A3C83DFCBAB3AB99EDD863DDFA4EDF1379BC9FA4BB78BA35D404D38D180992A
  • createdAtMillis - 1692675783987
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16938275104953307746A3C83DFCBAB3AB99EDD863DDFA4EDF1379BC9FA4BB78BA35D404D38D180992A