Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-22 04:34:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 79A4C0C647C7683A521A8E2D786A5F1F25166C44DA2666A7A4B88CDE944FE079
Participant Details

Original Note:

To add onto the other note, journalists do not just take any “anonymous” source and take it at face value. They take _credible_ sources who can back up their claims or at least provide compelling evidence that they know that they’re talking about.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1693826109471965243
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 79A4C0C647C7683A521A8E2D786A5F1F25166C44DA2666A7A4B88CDE944FE079
  • createdAtMillis - 1692678858953
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 169382610947196524379A4C0C647C7683A521A8E2D786A5F1F25166C44DA2666A7A4B88CDE944FE079