Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-22 08:52:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 97AEA654409032E42792FDC7756C050BF3A2487B9962A14E8C593CA7B8BDFE2C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ob der Schaden nachweislich von der Impfung stammte, war gerade Anlass des Verfahrens. Offenbar konnte das nicht ausreichend nachgewiesen werden. https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/gesellschaft/astrazeneca-klage-mainz-100.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1693695758002725063
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 97AEA654409032E42792FDC7756C050BF3A2487B9962A14E8C593CA7B8BDFE2C
  • createdAtMillis - 1692694367507
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 169369575800272506397AEA654409032E42792FDC7756C050BF3A2487B9962A14E8C593CA7B8BDFE2C