Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-21 22:06:03 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2711C7EA086B422AD51444B69354F3FE3B0539692E2D8A4392C1D4A038FA288A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ob der Schaden nachweislich von der Impfung stammte, war gerade Anlass des Verfahrens. Offenbar konnte das nicht ausreichend nachgewiesen werden. https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/gesellschaft/astrazeneca-klage-mainz-100.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1693695758002725063
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2711C7EA086B422AD51444B69354F3FE3B0539692E2D8A4392C1D4A038FA288A
  • createdAtMillis - 1692655563482
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16936957580027250632711C7EA086B422AD51444B69354F3FE3B0539692E2D8A4392C1D4A038FA288A