Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-22 00:19:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FEF4A80730C7E2D2A1BEC37ADDFBB490D9544E10B7BABAF9447ABF1DD450525B
Participant Details

Original Note:

While yes this claim had no source or methodology statement that is self evident from the post and so a note pointing that out is redundant. Unsourced speculation regarding what gaps in the data there may or may not be belongs in replies

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1693695022477070759
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FEF4A80730C7E2D2A1BEC37ADDFBB490D9544E10B7BABAF9447ABF1DD450525B
  • createdAtMillis - 1692663556251
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1693695022477070759FEF4A80730C7E2D2A1BEC37ADDFBB490D9544E10B7BABAF9447ABF1DD450525B