Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-21 18:58:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D5B114DEB3D75C70CFB6C04DE6105840620D2C5892DDE300869F8ED749EF393E
Participant Details

Original Note:

While yes this claim had no source or methodology statement that is self evident from the post and so a note pointing that out is redundant. Unsourced speculation regarding what gaps in the data there may or may not be belongs in replies

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1693695022477070759
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D5B114DEB3D75C70CFB6C04DE6105840620D2C5892DDE300869F8ED749EF393E
  • createdAtMillis - 1692644297224
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1693695022477070759D5B114DEB3D75C70CFB6C04DE6105840620D2C5892DDE300869F8ED749EF393E