Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-21 16:55:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E68613CF26123A32D9F4458058498E67BBA731512F0BD936C1EB8C11923FA2D3
Participant Details

Original Note:

The reason for the denial was based on the couple's homophobic views,and the child being openly LGBTQ+. lawsuit reads. “Only one reason was given for that denial: they ‘would not be affirming to a child who identified as LGBTQIA.’” https://www.boston.com/news/local-news/2023/08/11/lawsuit-catholic-couple-says-they-were-barred-from-fostering-children-lgbtq-beliefs/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1693666408985395539
participantId -
raterParticipantId - E68613CF26123A32D9F4458058498E67BBA731512F0BD936C1EB8C11923FA2D3
createdAtMillis - 1692636933012
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 1
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1693666408985395539E68613CF26123A32D9F4458058498E67BBA731512F0BD936C1EB8C11923FA2D3