Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-21 20:13:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9A4387B05ADCC90D317477B58478CFBDA7D93340DF7DE0880F7415C31F6CC989
Participant Details

Original Note:

The reason for the denial was based on the couple's homophobic views,and the child being openly LGBTQ+. lawsuit reads. “Only one reason was given for that denial: they ‘would not be affirming to a child who identified as LGBTQIA.’” https://www.boston.com/news/local-news/2023/08/11/lawsuit-catholic-couple-says-they-were-barred-from-fostering-children-lgbtq-beliefs/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1693666408985395539
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 9A4387B05ADCC90D317477B58478CFBDA7D93340DF7DE0880F7415C31F6CC989
createdAtMillis - 1692648835670
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 16936664089853955399A4387B05ADCC90D317477B58478CFBDA7D93340DF7DE0880F7415C31F6CC989