Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-21 09:51:19 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7727A4FD2022EAAFC290C6B6E4F87EC1E4676C50C15D2986D3F5102D4E0E5605
Participant Details

Original Note:

The reconstruction on the left was done by anatomical artist Richard Neave and contributors. Rather than showing what Jesus might have looked like, the image represents an average Judean from the first century. Meaning that it might as well be a picture of Judas. https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2015/12/25/what-did-jesus-look-like/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1693502079669813691
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7727A4FD2022EAAFC290C6B6E4F87EC1E4676C50C15D2986D3F5102D4E0E5605
  • createdAtMillis - 1692611479546
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16935020796698136917727A4FD2022EAAFC290C6B6E4F87EC1E4676C50C15D2986D3F5102D4E0E5605