Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-21 00:28:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 992DE44DB027B156346FB217E28927F43E4614CBA3B89D3C7E083396DEB9DE90
Participant Details

Original Note:

The other notes provided do give more context but aren't necessary in my opinion. To me it seems like while minor details are being left out, the author of this Tweet wasn't spreading fake news. Of course, I could be wrong in this.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1693372117033603369
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 992DE44DB027B156346FB217E28927F43E4614CBA3B89D3C7E083396DEB9DE90
  • createdAtMillis - 1692577719049
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1693372117033603369992DE44DB027B156346FB217E28927F43E4614CBA3B89D3C7E083396DEB9DE90