Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-20 19:17:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D253F2171F80C339905480E97AE3CE3CD55E1A75A8693114D3F3416BCA874C34
Participant Details

Original Note:

The strength of the evidence base for gender affirming care is the subject of intense medical debate. SEGM comments on some weaknesses in the JAMA Surgery study here: https://segm.org/long-term-regret-satisfaction-mastectomy-critical-appraisal Systematic reviews conducted in Sweden and the UK do not support gender affirming care for minors: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apa.16791 https://cass.independent-review.uk/nice-evidence-reviews/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1693266060605014319
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D253F2171F80C339905480E97AE3CE3CD55E1A75A8693114D3F3416BCA874C34
  • createdAtMillis - 1692559042840
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1693266060605014319D253F2171F80C339905480E97AE3CE3CD55E1A75A8693114D3F3416BCA874C34