Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-20 17:59:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D768C88A482F4B20DC378D73D01FAFB07C832F64C229E3C8DB24A6B2AC358A19
Participant Details

Original Note:

A) an expo with military elements does not qualify as „military target“ per IHL. B) even if it *was* a military target, the attack, which clearly and foreseeably led to a high toll of civilian victims and collateral damage, is therefore still in violation of IHL. https://hhi.harvard.edu/publications/legitimate-targets-attacks-under-international-humanitarian-law

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1693245747880132633
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D768C88A482F4B20DC378D73D01FAFB07C832F64C229E3C8DB24A6B2AC358A19
  • createdAtMillis - 1692554344406
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1693245747880132633D768C88A482F4B20DC378D73D01FAFB07C832F64C229E3C8DB24A6B2AC358A19