Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-26 18:04:04 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CB481F0BD3F20D46FFB67490F081FB43B53BF44288F0383DC78DFC26E7F3C577
Participant Details

Original Note:

A) an expo with military elements does not qualify as „military target“ per IHL. B) even if it *was* a military target, the attack, which clearly and foreseeably led to a high toll of civilian victims and collateral damage, is therefore still in violation of IHL. https://hhi.harvard.edu/publications/legitimate-targets-attacks-under-international-humanitarian-law

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1693245747880132633
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CB481F0BD3F20D46FFB67490F081FB43B53BF44288F0383DC78DFC26E7F3C577
  • createdAtMillis - 1693073044222
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1693245747880132633CB481F0BD3F20D46FFB67490F081FB43B53BF44288F0383DC78DFC26E7F3C577