Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-19 22:41:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5332702DAA8B8FB18DDF55AB80B61A5810A7C829F0AFCFAD63053134F2680582
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed note provides an incorrect summary of the Cochrane meta analysis of the mask literature. https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6/full The original tweet provides the opinion of the author about the journal article. The proposed note should be a comment not a CN. NNN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1692988928880443402
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5332702DAA8B8FB18DDF55AB80B61A5810A7C829F0AFCFAD63053134F2680582
  • createdAtMillis - 1692484903657
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16929889288804434025332702DAA8B8FB18DDF55AB80B61A5810A7C829F0AFCFAD63053134F2680582