Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-19 07:10:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E31E8D7288DD432339C0CC3F13DF6C06F31EAC0901B5D6DD894DB06CBE938026
Participant Details

Original Note:

Author makes fun of a ideological opponent. It doesn’t change anything on his past views, so no added context seems required. It’s also not misleading since he doesn’t try to conceal his opponent real opinion, nor try to change his own.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1692787455672402335
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E31E8D7288DD432339C0CC3F13DF6C06F31EAC0901B5D6DD894DB06CBE938026
  • createdAtMillis - 1692429051201
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1692787455672402335E31E8D7288DD432339C0CC3F13DF6C06F31EAC0901B5D6DD894DB06CBE938026