Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-19 13:29:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8A53C724AFC24A4A3F67F6AD37DB93DC6667F0A8D9B4E65D78F154FAE2671BE8
Participant Details

Original Note:

Author makes fun of a ideological opponent. It doesn’t change anything on his past views, so no added context seems required. It’s also not misleading since he doesn’t try to conceal his opponent real opinion, nor try to change his own.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1692787455672402335
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8A53C724AFC24A4A3F67F6AD37DB93DC6667F0A8D9B4E65D78F154FAE2671BE8
  • createdAtMillis - 1692451786058
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16927874556724023358A53C724AFC24A4A3F67F6AD37DB93DC6667F0A8D9B4E65D78F154FAE2671BE8