Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-19 11:43:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5579F241219C5C392478E2656AA9B5D33653E5E42707E2A2F0FA2BD4E7970F12
Participant Details

Original Note:

Author makes fun of a ideological opponent. It doesn’t change anything on his past views, so no added context seems required. It’s also not misleading since he doesn’t try to conceal his opponent real opinion, nor try to change his own.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1692787455672402335
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5579F241219C5C392478E2656AA9B5D33653E5E42707E2A2F0FA2BD4E7970F12
  • createdAtMillis - 1692445400555
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16927874556724023355579F241219C5C392478E2656AA9B5D33653E5E42707E2A2F0FA2BD4E7970F12