Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-19 09:02:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3D6DD4DE35647C4A15D7EC8467B0C3F5A91D2635D9238D9B77775AFC41B21F70
Participant Details

Original Note:

Author makes fun of a ideological opponent. It doesn’t change anything on his past views, so no added context seems required. It’s also not misleading since he doesn’t try to conceal his opponent real opinion, nor try to change his own.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1692787455672402335
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3D6DD4DE35647C4A15D7EC8467B0C3F5A91D2635D9238D9B77775AFC41B21F70
  • createdAtMillis - 1692435731826
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16927874556724023353D6DD4DE35647C4A15D7EC8467B0C3F5A91D2635D9238D9B77775AFC41B21F70