Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-19 01:16:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 27FF89160A79C543006A19187CDC9378AE487D87D23C32DFFEF4F9CFB63FEEBF
Participant Details

Original Note:

On page 22 of 26 the sec writes: The sec does not argue that the assets underlying those investment contracts were security the sec does not appellate revieuw of any holding related to the fact that the underlying assets here are nothing but computer code with no inherent value https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/i7ig6rniyf5znqeqcyyt1/SEC-Motion-to-Certify-Interlocutory-Appeal.pdf?dl=0&rlkey=1a7teoq0qmqcjicshn0lajxy8

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1692677629868908991
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 27FF89160A79C543006A19187CDC9378AE487D87D23C32DFFEF4F9CFB63FEEBF
  • createdAtMillis - 1692407765385
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 169267762986890899127FF89160A79C543006A19187CDC9378AE487D87D23C32DFFEF4F9CFB63FEEBF