Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-18 12:15:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 722C4D4400095CE81814208D77C778474964CE86DF751EBD0928B8D7E6FFAE65
Participant Details

Original Note:

A nota das associações se sugere técnico-científica e factual, mas é política e opinativa, porque faz a escolha de omitir evidências e outras informações relevantes que sejam contrárias à sua conclusão anti-descriminalização. Conclusão esta que é prescritiva, e não descritiva.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1692461374671135036
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 722C4D4400095CE81814208D77C778474964CE86DF751EBD0928B8D7E6FFAE65
  • createdAtMillis - 1692360947842
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1692461374671135036722C4D4400095CE81814208D77C778474964CE86DF751EBD0928B8D7E6FFAE65