Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-18 14:09:59 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 44AA956C80610B05EDEA00DBE14E3B24112D16C1E42B49DC0D8221A83D915854
Participant Details

Original Note:

A nota das associações se sugere técnico-científica e factual, mas é política e opinativa, porque faz a escolha de omitir evidências e outras informações relevantes que sejam contrárias à sua conclusão anti-descriminalização. Conclusão esta que é prescritiva, e não descritiva.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1692461374671135036
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 44AA956C80610B05EDEA00DBE14E3B24112D16C1E42B49DC0D8221A83D915854
  • createdAtMillis - 1692367799467
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 169246137467113503644AA956C80610B05EDEA00DBE14E3B24112D16C1E42B49DC0D8221A83D915854