Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-18 14:49:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2AC350FA7D807ECFF11C7D12F0AB7B9E30F27178DF2C029C97AA6E8F0F40CD6C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article presents outdated information from Publishers Weekly. Their hardcover nonfiction bestseller list for the week of August 14 places “Tucker” at #3. This article, written the same day, uses the previous week’s bestseller list where “Tucker” was #15. https://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/nielsen/index.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1692374187199934963
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2AC350FA7D807ECFF11C7D12F0AB7B9E30F27178DF2C029C97AA6E8F0F40CD6C
  • createdAtMillis - 1692370142851
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16923741871999349632AC350FA7D807ECFF11C7D12F0AB7B9E30F27178DF2C029C97AA6E8F0F40CD6C