Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-19 00:07:14 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EEF7E9B2C8D78BAF71350AC5043BF94AAA936E1862A3EB0D963212D184EA719F
Participant Details

Original Note:

In addition to NNN to the tweet, the article discussed how addresses (which were not disclosed on the indictment) were included. The proposed CN misses the point and is inappropriate.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1692270732166811665
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EEF7E9B2C8D78BAF71350AC5043BF94AAA936E1862A3EB0D963212D184EA719F
  • createdAtMillis - 1692403634556
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1692270732166811665EEF7E9B2C8D78BAF71350AC5043BF94AAA936E1862A3EB0D963212D184EA719F