Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-17 21:04:38 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BAAF6232C7E5417A76BD313D12678646DC2E13386E0747E0E3444C01D18020E9
Participant Details

Original Note:

In addition to NNN to the tweet, the article discussed how addresses (which were not disclosed on the indictment) were included. The proposed CN misses the point and is inappropriate.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1692270732166811665
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BAAF6232C7E5417A76BD313D12678646DC2E13386E0747E0E3444C01D18020E9
  • createdAtMillis - 1692306278837
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1692270732166811665BAAF6232C7E5417A76BD313D12678646DC2E13386E0747E0E3444C01D18020E9