Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-17 22:35:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 527D00A503D0C6E681828C020A24B78C7DB8585D7720A5D9778F2FD0BAAD654A
Participant Details

Original Note:

In addition to NNN to the tweet, the article discussed how addresses (which were not disclosed on the indictment) were included. The proposed CN misses the point and is inappropriate.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1692270732166811665
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 527D00A503D0C6E681828C020A24B78C7DB8585D7720A5D9778F2FD0BAAD654A
  • createdAtMillis - 1692311709329
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1692270732166811665527D00A503D0C6E681828C020A24B78C7DB8585D7720A5D9778F2FD0BAAD654A