Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-17 20:34:36 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1C9E066F7D25E3D2BFD645602AE52B97A9E74C804A9D82FD3264C1BD6264C692
Participant Details

Original Note:

In addition to NNN to the tweet, the article discussed how addresses (which were not disclosed on the indictment) were included. The proposed CN misses the point and is inappropriate.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1692270732166811665
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1C9E066F7D25E3D2BFD645602AE52B97A9E74C804A9D82FD3264C1BD6264C692
  • createdAtMillis - 1692304476140
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16922707321668116651C9E066F7D25E3D2BFD645602AE52B97A9E74C804A9D82FD3264C1BD6264C692