Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-17 14:32:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 75D6513C18C733F2C61F3BA042C1E16C5EAAD2AF9E692895E2BFECDAF44B0708
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. 同一の事案のなかでならともかく人が過去の主張に拘束されなくてはならない理由もない。 過去の発言について、現在どうなのかと相手に説明を求めるべき話は、ノートでやるべきではない。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1692157248095830053
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 75D6513C18C733F2C61F3BA042C1E16C5EAAD2AF9E692895E2BFECDAF44B0708
  • createdAtMillis - 1692282756988
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 169215724809583005375D6513C18C733F2C61F3BA042C1E16C5EAAD2AF9E692895E2BFECDAF44B0708