Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-18 10:13:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 970C219D1044DFF6C0F30B85711D7EA23284FDE2C2EED24AFAB81D175D9A6228
Participant Details

Original Note:

In de bron wordt niet vermeld op welke tijdsspanne deze cijfers betrekking hebben of waar de cijfers vandaan komen. In de tweet zijn bovendien landen weggeknipt, zoals Spanje, Zuid-Korea en Oostenrijk. De informatie in deze tweet is dus niet geverifieerd en mogelijk onjuist. https://twitter.com/stats_feed/status/1692010864604307825

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1692117037391249752
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 970C219D1044DFF6C0F30B85711D7EA23284FDE2C2EED24AFAB81D175D9A6228
createdAtMillis - 1692353621909
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1692117037391249752970C219D1044DFF6C0F30B85711D7EA23284FDE2C2EED24AFAB81D175D9A6228