Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-17 12:50:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 581D2FD91E47B5BEFEB47C46D5ABB69012E17EBD8FF6B9B16D911C0FA40B1689
Participant Details

Original Note:

In de bron wordt niet vermeld op welke tijdsspanne deze cijfers betrekking hebben of waar de cijfers vandaan komen. In de tweet zijn bovendien landen weggeknipt, zoals Spanje, Zuid-Korea en Oostenrijk. De informatie in deze tweet is dus niet geverifieerd en mogelijk onjuist. https://twitter.com/stats_feed/status/1692010864604307825

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1692117037391249752
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 581D2FD91E47B5BEFEB47C46D5ABB69012E17EBD8FF6B9B16D911C0FA40B1689
createdAtMillis - 1692276651758
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1692117037391249752581D2FD91E47B5BEFEB47C46D5ABB69012E17EBD8FF6B9B16D911C0FA40B1689