Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-17 12:12:38 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F8FF87E7E2412F69243C8DF8F19D828E4A5D7AA6A71A02C9B3C1F02D624A98D6
Participant Details

Original Note:

L'étude rends compte que 180k comptes parmi un groupe de 360k du "tweeter environnemental" sont moins actif en avril 2023 qu'en juillet 2019. Les biais éventuels de cette étude doivent être analysés avant toute conclusions définitives. https://www.cell.com/trends/ecology-evolution/fulltext/S0169-5347(23)00189-1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1692064066896879943
participantId -
raterParticipantId - F8FF87E7E2412F69243C8DF8F19D828E4A5D7AA6A71A02C9B3C1F02D624A98D6
createdAtMillis - 1692274358949
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1692064066896879943F8FF87E7E2412F69243C8DF8F19D828E4A5D7AA6A71A02C9B3C1F02D624A98D6