Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-17 12:54:12 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 82D4D0AD1DEF9A7EF43BF7E4FDA9AF60C7CBBE84F0DE50328194C154683C744F
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no scientific evidence that remote viewing exists, and the topic of remote viewing is generally regarded as pseudoscience https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_viewing https://skepdic.com/remotevw.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1691992597055910208
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 82D4D0AD1DEF9A7EF43BF7E4FDA9AF60C7CBBE84F0DE50328194C154683C744F
  • createdAtMillis - 1692276852646
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 169199259705591020882D4D0AD1DEF9A7EF43BF7E4FDA9AF60C7CBBE84F0DE50328194C154683C744F