Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-17 02:19:40 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 18594157487434E0B7BF6CA50F47C6A22AE863C44FD7C881B0D2AB3EE355D15A
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no scientific evidence that remote viewing exists, and the topic of remote viewing is generally regarded as pseudoscience https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_viewing https://skepdic.com/remotevw.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1691992597055910208
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 18594157487434E0B7BF6CA50F47C6A22AE863C44FD7C881B0D2AB3EE355D15A
  • createdAtMillis - 1692238780175
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 169199259705591020818594157487434E0B7BF6CA50F47C6A22AE863C44FD7C881B0D2AB3EE355D15A