Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-18 09:24:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C78B58351151F1E7E29379FA561D73B7CC128D82B5157FE021D11C9BE177D8BC
Participant Details

Original Note:

この投稿はまるでマスクの効果がないようにミスリードする内容になっているので注意が必要です 当該のコクランレビューではエビデンスの信頼性が低〜中程度と低くこれだけを持ってマスクの効果に懐疑的な見方をするのは適切ではありません https://www.carenet.com/news/general/carenet/55931 また誤解を招く認識が広がったと編集長も謝罪しています https://news.yahoo.co.jp/expert/articles/c4ae298b82b0e7730cde815bccb240ee2c38310a

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1691970526359748769
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C78B58351151F1E7E29379FA561D73B7CC128D82B5157FE021D11C9BE177D8BC
  • createdAtMillis - 1692350683318
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1691970526359748769C78B58351151F1E7E29379FA561D73B7CC128D82B5157FE021D11C9BE177D8BC