Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-17 15:03:53 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E92B2A33DC6BED1450926FF6DB5AD4F194AD31F63AB2A0A104EEB7EF7D0F7C54
Participant Details

Original Note:

The AI model did not accurately report the scientific research it was trained on, and produced garbled nonsensical answers. The full article can be read here: https://www.cnet.com/science/meta-trained-an-ai-on-48-million-science-papers-it-was-shut-down-after-two-days/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1691936007934099910
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E92B2A33DC6BED1450926FF6DB5AD4F194AD31F63AB2A0A104EEB7EF7D0F7C54
  • createdAtMillis - 1692284633294
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1691936007934099910E92B2A33DC6BED1450926FF6DB5AD4F194AD31F63AB2A0A104EEB7EF7D0F7C54