Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-17 21:05:33 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A2693D078E132CF73CAABFCDC2F35B656DD8F6E4F7D47713F32306A1B5C3C972
Participant Details

Original Note:

The AI model did not accurately report the scientific research it was trained on, and produced garbled nonsensical answers. The full article can be read here: https://www.cnet.com/science/meta-trained-an-ai-on-48-million-science-papers-it-was-shut-down-after-two-days/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1691936007934099910
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A2693D078E132CF73CAABFCDC2F35B656DD8F6E4F7D47713F32306A1B5C3C972
  • createdAtMillis - 1692306333428
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1691936007934099910A2693D078E132CF73CAABFCDC2F35B656DD8F6E4F7D47713F32306A1B5C3C972