Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-16 23:25:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D289D22C7A6F35C5707E5C6A51B01F17B95F270A7E7DAC52D4F4B23D3C7B2E6E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Although AI could replace some photography disciplines almost completely, AI cannot replace the human relationship, the creativity, the emotion involved in capturing and creating images, nor can it create truly bespoke, original photography. https://www.thephoblographer.com/2020/02/23/could-ai-photography-kill-our-industry-it-may-be-possible/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1691809197866840203
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D289D22C7A6F35C5707E5C6A51B01F17B95F270A7E7DAC52D4F4B23D3C7B2E6E
  • createdAtMillis - 1692228328526
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1691809197866840203D289D22C7A6F35C5707E5C6A51B01F17B95F270A7E7DAC52D4F4B23D3C7B2E6E