Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-16 01:25:46 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B96F5FDE60DE56F8EEB185262AACB9F9DED806503F32B729655F7D13C1B79E21
Participant Details

Original Note:

This article does not disclose that the study it cites uses the much less capable GPT-3.5-turbo model, rather than the more advanced GPT-4. Additionally, the study used the API rather than the website and so intentionally chose to use a worse model. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2308.02312.pdf (model on bottom of page 3)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1691502802231501280
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B96F5FDE60DE56F8EEB185262AACB9F9DED806503F32B729655F7D13C1B79E21
  • createdAtMillis - 1692149146052
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1691502802231501280B96F5FDE60DE56F8EEB185262AACB9F9DED806503F32B729655F7D13C1B79E21