Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-15 13:53:46 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E3DE9827FD57F0AE5F6CF5C4D032EBAEBAA4B92ACD1E2AA64D80EB6A10787BA2
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note is argumentative, vague, and does not provide info that can not be found in the tweet (visualization clearly starts in 1880). Cites Wikipedia in an attempt to overrule NASA. Tweet is clear, factually correct, contains neither misleading nor exaggerated statements.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1691427290452734178
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E3DE9827FD57F0AE5F6CF5C4D032EBAEBAA4B92ACD1E2AA64D80EB6A10787BA2
  • createdAtMillis - 1692107626113
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1691427290452734178E3DE9827FD57F0AE5F6CF5C4D032EBAEBAA4B92ACD1E2AA64D80EB6A10787BA2