Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-11 07:33:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DF7FED25AF4707CD78111FC54CC37329E42CE95FFD2D3BE96F865D2907366F9E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note is argumentative, vague, and does not provide info that can not be found in the tweet (visualization clearly starts in 1880). Cites Wikipedia in an attempt to overrule NASA. Tweet is clear, factually correct, contains neither misleading nor exaggerated statements.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1691427290452734178
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DF7FED25AF4707CD78111FC54CC37329E42CE95FFD2D3BE96F865D2907366F9E
  • createdAtMillis - 1712820784766
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1691427290452734178DF7FED25AF4707CD78111FC54CC37329E42CE95FFD2D3BE96F865D2907366F9E